Indian Gaming
Arizona Indian Gaming Statutes
Arizona/Tribal Gaming Compacts
National Indian Gaming Commission Laws and Regulations
Includes full-text of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
Related Case Law:
California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987)
The Court held that state gaming laws do not apply to a tribal bingo enterprise.
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1996)
The Court held that the Indian Commerce Clause does not grant Congress the power to abrogate a state's sovereign immunity.
American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. Hull, 305 F.3d 1015 (9th Cir. 2002)
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that tribes were indispensable parties to an action because their power to negotiate gambling compacts potentially was impaired.
Related Multimedia from ArizonaNativeNet
Session 3: Some Tools to Govern Effectively
Joseph P. Kalt
Native Nation Building: Emerging Leaders 2007
Moderator: Dr. Ian Record, Manager, Leadership and Management Programs, Native Nations Institute Negotiating Presenter: … |